top of page

Managing SME Reviews: How to Prevent Endless Feedback Loops in eLearning Projects



One of the most common challenges in eLearning development is navigating endless review cycles with Subject Matter Experts (SMEs). While their input is essential, without structure, the process can easily spiral—causing delays, rework, and frustration for everyone involved.

Here are proven strategies to manage SME feedback efficiently and keep your project on track:

1. Define Clear Review Stages

Break the review process into well-defined phases, such as:

  • Content Review (script or raw text only)

  • Storyboard Review (structure, flow, and key visuals)

  • Alpha/Beta Review (fully functional course)

Let SMEs know what they’re expected to focus on at each stage. This reduces confusion and avoids repeated feedback on the same elements.

2. Set Expectations Early

At project kickoff, clearly communicate:

  • How many rounds of review will be allowed

  • Deadlines for each review phase

  • That major changes after a certain point may delay delivery or incur additional cost

Capture this agreement in writing—either in a project charter or review policy document.

3. Provide Tools for Streamlined Feedback

Use review platforms like:

  • Articulate Review 360

  • Lectora ReviewLink

  • Adobe Captivate Reviewer

These tools allow SMEs to comment directly on each screen, making the feedback process faster, more organized, and easier to track.

4. Offer a Feedback Template

Give reviewers a simple form to organize their input, including:

  • Slide or module number

  • Specific comment or concern

  • Suggested change (if applicable)

  • Priority level (e.g., Critical, Nice-to-Have)

This encourages focused, actionable feedback.

5. Limit the Number of Reviewers

Too many voices can lead to conflicting input and decision paralysis. Limit the review team to one or two designated SMEs, and ask them to consolidate feedback before submitting.

6. Preempt Confusion with Early Demos

Walk SMEs through a live demo or prototype early in the project. This helps align expectations and reduces misinterpretation later in development.

7. Set a Change Freeze Date

Establish a clear cutoff point after which only critical fixes will be accepted. This protects your timeline and reinforces the importance of timely, consolidated feedback.

By applying these strategies, you transform the SME review process into a structured, collaborative partnership—one that respects subject matter expertise and safeguards your project’s efficiency.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page